Phylogeographic differentiation in the mitochondrial control region in thekoala, Phascolarctos cinereus (Goldfuss 1817)

Citation
Ba. Houlden et al., Phylogeographic differentiation in the mitochondrial control region in thekoala, Phascolarctos cinereus (Goldfuss 1817), MOL ECOL, 8(6), 1999, pp. 999-1011
Citations number
72
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology,"Molecular Biology & Genetics
Journal title
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
09621083 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
999 - 1011
Database
ISI
SICI code
0962-1083(199906)8:6<999:PDITMC>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The koala, Phascolarctos cinereus, is a geographically widespread species e ndemic to Australia, with three currently recognized subspecies: P.c. adust us, P.c. cinereus, and P.c. victor. Intraspecific variation in the mitochon drial DNA (mtDNA) control region was examined in over 200 animals from 16 r epresentative populations throughout the species' range. Eighteen different haplotypes were defined in the approximate to 860 bp mtDNA control region as determined by heteroduplex analysis/temperature gradient gel electrophor esis (HDA/TGGE). Any single population typically possessed only one or two haplotypes yielding an average within-population haplotypic diversity of 0. 180 +/- 0.003, and nucleotide diversity of 0.16%. Overall, mtDNA control re gion sequence diversity between populations averaged 0.67%, and ranged from 0% to 1.56%. Nucleotide divergence between populations averaged 0.51%, and ranged from 0% to 1.53%. Neighbour-joining methods revealed limited phylog enetic distinction between geographically distant populations of koalas, an d tentative support for a single evolutionarily significant unit (ESU). Thi s is consistent with previous suggestions that the morphological difference s formalized by subspecific taxonomy may be interpreted as clinal variation . Significant differentiation in mtDNA-haplotype frequencies between locali ties suggested that little gene now currently exists among populations. Whe n combined with microsatellite analysis, which has revealed substantial dif ferentiation among koala populations, we conclude that the appropriate shor t-term management unit (MU) for koalas is the local population.