Ew. Marvin et A. Brinkman, The effect of modulation and formal manipulation on perception of tonic closure by expert listeners, MUSIC PERC, 16(4), 1999, pp. 389-407
This study arises in response to previous research that calls into question
the ability of musically trained listeners to perceive tonal closure in th
e original tonic key. In our Experiment 1, 36 experienced musicians heard 1
2 randomly ordered excerpts from piano and orchestral works in three catego
ries: nonmodulating, modulating to the dominant, modulating to a key other
than the dominant. After hearing each excerpt, participants answered six qu
estions, one of which asked whether the concluding key was the same as the
initial one. Participants correctly answered this question at above-chance
levels, with music academics (theorists and musicologists) more accurate th
an other musicians. In Experiment 2, 33 experienced musicians heard MIDI pe
rformances of six Handel keyboard compositions. On each trial, participants
heard either the original composition or one of two variants with phrase u
nits rearranged. Trials were quasi-randomly ordered so that an original and
variant were not heard in succession. Three types of tonal motion resulted
from our formal manipulation: the stimulus began and ended in the tonic ke
y, began and ended in the dominant key, or began and ended in different key
s. After hearing each work, participants answered seven questions, of which
data were analyzed for three: whether the beginning and ending key were th
e same, whether the harmonic structure conformed to stylistic expectations,
and whether the final key was the tonic. Participants' accuracy on the beg
inning/ending key question was no better than chance would predict; however
listeners were able to discriminate between works that ended in the tonic
key and those that did not. Unlike Experiment 1, we found no significant di
fferences in accuracy between music academics and other musicians. Listener
s generally found both the original and the manipulated compositions to con
form to stylistic expectations, possibly because they attended to local har
monic relationships rather than global ones.