Comparison of episcleral plaque and proton beam radiation therapy for the treatment of choroidal melanoma

Citation
Mw. Wilson et Jl. Hungerford, Comparison of episcleral plaque and proton beam radiation therapy for the treatment of choroidal melanoma, OPHTHALMOL, 106(8), 1999, pp. 1579-1587
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology,"da verificare
Journal title
OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
01616420 → ACNP
Volume
106
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1579 - 1587
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6420(199908)106:8<1579:COEPAP>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of iodine-125 (I-125) and ruthenium-106 (R u-106) episcleral plaque radiation therapy and proton beam radiation therap y (PBRT) in the treatment of choroidal melanoma. Design: A retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study. Methods: Charts of patients treated with I-125, Ru-106, and PERT for choroi dal melanoma between January 1988 and June 1996 at St. Bartholomew's Hospit al and Moorfields Eye Hospitals were reviewed. Main Outcome Measure: Local control of choroidal melanomas after I-125,Ru-1 06, Or PERT. Results: A total of 597 patients were identified (I-125 = 190, Ru-106 = 140 , PERT = 267). Patients treated with Ru-106 had a significantly greater ris k of local tumor recurrence than did patients treated with either I-125 (P = 0.0133; confidence interval [CI], 1.26-7.02; risk ratio, 2.97) or PERT (P = 0.0097; CI, 1.30-6.66; risk ratio, 2.94). A stepwise Cox proportional ha zard model found maximal basal diameter to be a significant covariate (P = 0.0033). Conclusion: Patients treated with Ru-106 had a significantly greater risk o f local tumor recurrence than did those patients treated with either I-125 or PBRT.