We extend Real Option Theory to evaluate natural resource development proje
cts that may bring negative net benefits and require costly restoration. Ba
sed on a new concept, irreversibility cost, we show that the degree of irre
versibility becomes an endogenous choice, rather than an exogenously given
economic constraint, Fixed costs of restoration have continuous impacts, ov
er and above the widely recognized fixed effects, on development and restor
ation levels (and the marginal q). The project's value may not necessarily
be convex in the underlying random variable, and discounting may in fact en
courage the pattern of developing now and restoring later.