V. Kuhlkamp et al., A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing ventricular fibrillation detection time between two transvenous defibrillator models, PACE, 22(7), 1999, pp. 990-998
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
The Ventak AV is an implantable cardioverter defibrillator with dual chambe
r pacing capability. Features include detection and treatment of ventricula
r arrhythmias, detection of atrial arrhythmias, as well as dual chamber pac
ing, The objective of the investigation was to verify the efficacy of the V
entak AV in detecting ventricular fibrillation in the presence of dual cham
ber pacing. Thirty-three patients, who: were to receive an implantable defi
brillator were randomized (1:1) in a paired comparison study to the Ventak
AV (study device) and the Ventak Mini (control) during defibrillation thres
hold testing. In order to create a "worst case scenario" for sensing of ven
tricular fibrillation, pacing was performed at high lower rate limit values
(Ventak AV DDD pacing at 150/min, Ventak Mini at VVI 100/min). Ventricular
fibrillation was induced and the randomized device was allowed to detect a
nd treat the arrhythmia. This test was repeated or each patient using the a
lternate device in a randomized order, such that all patients were tested w
ith both devices. The mean ventricular fibrillation detection time for the
Ventak AV was 2.0 +/- 0.11 seconds and for the control device the detection
time was 1.8 +/- 0.12 seconds (P = 0.26). Appropriate tachyarrhythmia ther
apy decision was documented in all episodes for both devices. The study pat
ient population demonstrated equivalent ventricular fibrillation detection
time between the Ventak AV and the Ventak Mini. The Ventak AV demonstrated
effectiveness in detecting ventricular fibrillation in the presence of high
rate dual chamber pacing.