Layer strain pullets were reared on litter and given an 8-h photoperiod to
10 wk of age. They were then transferred to cages in which light intensity
at the feed trough varied from 5 to 14 lx. Thirty birds continued on 8 h li
ght (L):16 h dark (D) (negative controls), and another 30 birds were given
14L:10D (positive controls). Two other groups of 30 birds were given a regi
men of 3 dim:8 L:3 dim:10 D with intensity during the dim phase ranging fro
m 0.03 to 0.42 lx (very dim) or from 0.6 to 3.0 lx (marginal).
Mean age at first egg (AFE) differed by 30 d between the positive and negat
ive controls. Birds receiving very dim lighting matured 10 d earlier than t
he negative controls but 20 d later than positive controls. It is concluded
that either the very dim light was itself nonstimulatory but had a phase s
hifting effect upon the biological clock that caused the 8-h normal light t
o fall partly in the photoinducible phase, or the first 3 h of very dim lig
ht was added to the bright phase to form an 11-h photoperiod. Birds in the
top tier of the room with marginal supplementary lighting received 1.7 to 3
.0 lx and matured at the same age as the positive controls, whereas those i
n the bottom tier received 0.6 to 0.9 lx and matured at the same age as the
negative controls. Birds in the middle tier showed an intermediate AFE.
It is concluded that the threshold intensity at the feed trough for white l
ight stimulation of the photoperiodic mechanism in caged pullets lies betwe
en 0.9 and 1.7 lx. However, very dim lighting, below the threshold required
for stimulation of a photoperiodic response, may shift the biological cloc
k with unexpected consequences and, as a result, there is no known intensit
y of dim light that can be equated with darkness for all purposes.