Light intensity and age at first egg in pullets

Citation
Pd. Lewis et al., Light intensity and age at first egg in pullets, POULTRY SCI, 78(8), 1999, pp. 1227-1231
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
POULTRY SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00325791 → ACNP
Volume
78
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1227 - 1231
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-5791(199908)78:8<1227:LIAAAF>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Layer strain pullets were reared on litter and given an 8-h photoperiod to 10 wk of age. They were then transferred to cages in which light intensity at the feed trough varied from 5 to 14 lx. Thirty birds continued on 8 h li ght (L):16 h dark (D) (negative controls), and another 30 birds were given 14L:10D (positive controls). Two other groups of 30 birds were given a regi men of 3 dim:8 L:3 dim:10 D with intensity during the dim phase ranging fro m 0.03 to 0.42 lx (very dim) or from 0.6 to 3.0 lx (marginal). Mean age at first egg (AFE) differed by 30 d between the positive and negat ive controls. Birds receiving very dim lighting matured 10 d earlier than t he negative controls but 20 d later than positive controls. It is concluded that either the very dim light was itself nonstimulatory but had a phase s hifting effect upon the biological clock that caused the 8-h normal light t o fall partly in the photoinducible phase, or the first 3 h of very dim lig ht was added to the bright phase to form an 11-h photoperiod. Birds in the top tier of the room with marginal supplementary lighting received 1.7 to 3 .0 lx and matured at the same age as the positive controls, whereas those i n the bottom tier received 0.6 to 0.9 lx and matured at the same age as the negative controls. Birds in the middle tier showed an intermediate AFE. It is concluded that the threshold intensity at the feed trough for white l ight stimulation of the photoperiodic mechanism in caged pullets lies betwe en 0.9 and 1.7 lx. However, very dim lighting, below the threshold required for stimulation of a photoperiodic response, may shift the biological cloc k with unexpected consequences and, as a result, there is no known intensit y of dim light that can be equated with darkness for all purposes.