Food production and food harvesting systems common in the areas contaminate
d by the Chernobyl accident in Russia and Ukraine can be grouped into three
major categories: collective farm produce, private farming produce and foo
ds collected from natural ecosystems. The contribution of each of these sou
rces to radiocaesium intake by people living in rural settlements in the mi
d 1990s has been estimated at two major study sites, one in each country. T
he collective farm system provided the smallest contribution (7-14%) to the
intake of radiocaesium at both sites. Natural food was the major contribut
or to intake at the Russian site (83%). Whereas private farm produce was th
e major contributor (68%) at the Ukrainian study site. The difference betwe
en the two sites was mainly because private milk production was stopped at
the Russian site due to the contamination in 1986. A retrospective assessme
nt of the situation 1 year after the accident shows that collective farming
could have been a minor contributor to radiocaesium intake (8%), whilst pr
ivate farming would have been the major contributor wherever private milk p
roduction and consumption continued. The extent to which inhabitants consum
e natural foods from forests has a considerable effect on their radiocaesiu
m intake. The comparative importance of food products from natural ecosyste
ms increases with time due to the long effective ecological half-lives of r
adiocaesium in unimproved pastures and forests. Estimation of the fluxes of
radiocaesium from the different production and harvesting systems showed t
hat the contribution from private farming and food harvesting from natural
ecosystems may be significant, contributing 14-30% to the total fluxes of r
adiocaesium from an area even if the quantity of food produced in these sys
tems is small. However, the major contributor to the flux exported from an
area was the collective farming system, accounting for about 70-86% of the
total. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.