Ra. Falcone et al., A prospective comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound us intraoperative cholangiogram during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, SURG ENDOSC, 13(8), 1999, pp. 784-788
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Background: The laparoscopic ultrasound (US)probe provides a new modality f
or evaluating biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
Methods: We performed a laparoscopic US examination in 65 patients without
suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones prior to the performance of a lapar
oscopic cholangiogram (IOC). We then compared the cost, time required, surg
eon's assessment of difficulty, and interpretations of findings.
Results: There was a significant difference in the cost of US versus the co
st of IOC ($362 +/- 12 versus $665 +/- 12; p < 0.05). Surgeons who had perf
ormed >10 US (EXP) were compared with those who had performed less than or
equal to 10 (NOV). There were significant differences between the EXP and N
OV groups in ease of examination, visualization of biliary anatomy, and acc
uracy of measurement of the CBD.
Conclusions: The use of laparoscopic US for the accurate evaluation of the
CBD and biliary anatomy requires that the surgeon has surpassed the learnin
g curve, which we have defined as having performed >10 US exams.