Intraspecific phylogeny analysis using ITS sequences: Insights from studies of the Streptanthus glandulosus complex (cruciferae)

Citation
Ms. Mayer et Ps. Soltis, Intraspecific phylogeny analysis using ITS sequences: Insights from studies of the Streptanthus glandulosus complex (cruciferae), SYST BOT, 24(1), 1999, pp. 47-61
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
SYSTEMATIC BOTANY
ISSN journal
03636445 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
47 - 61
Database
ISI
SICI code
0363-6445(199901/03)24:1<47:IPAUIS>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Within many lineages diversity of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) reg ion of nuclear ribosomal RNA genes has proven comparable to that of restric tion sites of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA). Although cpDNA polymorphism has prov en useful in many phylogenetic studies at the intraspecific level, the util ity of ITS sequences in this application has been subjected only to limited testing. The Streptanthus glandulosus complex is an ideal candidate for th is evaluation, given the substantial variation in cpDNA restriction site an d enzyme electrophoretic markers present among populations. ITS sequences w ere obtained for 31 populations within the complex; phylogenetic patterns d erived from these data were compared to a cpDNA phylogeny based on restrict ion site data from a previous study. No population exhibited the same ITS s equence, and average divergence among populations was 2.57%. The ITS strict consensus tree bears clades that are geographically distinct, but lacking in internal resolution we suspect that some combination of gene flow, linea ge sorting, and recombination has led to low resolution within these major clades. The ITS tree shares many features with the cpDNA tree but the two a lso display substantial incongruities, including one that may have arisen v ia cytoplasmic introgression. Greater consistency is exhibited by the cpDNA tree, most likely due to the haploid and non-recombining nature of the chl oroplast genome. Combining the ITS and cpDNA data results in a more highly resolved tree than those from either of the separate analyses. Despite the pitfalls of using a diploid, recombining data source like ITS at the intras pecific level, potential benefits include tracking of maternal and paternal lineages as well as insight into patterns and levels of gene flow among po pulations. Furthermore, the joint use of ITS and cpDNA markers facilitates independent assessment of intraspecific phylogenetic hypotheses and can exp ose cases in which introgression or phylogenetic sorting has caused incongr uencies among haplotype trees.