Ms. Mayer et Ps. Soltis, Intraspecific phylogeny analysis using ITS sequences: Insights from studies of the Streptanthus glandulosus complex (cruciferae), SYST BOT, 24(1), 1999, pp. 47-61
Within many lineages diversity of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) reg
ion of nuclear ribosomal RNA genes has proven comparable to that of restric
tion sites of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA). Although cpDNA polymorphism has prov
en useful in many phylogenetic studies at the intraspecific level, the util
ity of ITS sequences in this application has been subjected only to limited
testing. The Streptanthus glandulosus complex is an ideal candidate for th
is evaluation, given the substantial variation in cpDNA restriction site an
d enzyme electrophoretic markers present among populations. ITS sequences w
ere obtained for 31 populations within the complex; phylogenetic patterns d
erived from these data were compared to a cpDNA phylogeny based on restrict
ion site data from a previous study. No population exhibited the same ITS s
equence, and average divergence among populations was 2.57%. The ITS strict
consensus tree bears clades that are geographically distinct, but lacking
in internal resolution we suspect that some combination of gene flow, linea
ge sorting, and recombination has led to low resolution within these major
clades. The ITS tree shares many features with the cpDNA tree but the two a
lso display substantial incongruities, including one that may have arisen v
ia cytoplasmic introgression. Greater consistency is exhibited by the cpDNA
tree, most likely due to the haploid and non-recombining nature of the chl
oroplast genome. Combining the ITS and cpDNA data results in a more highly
resolved tree than those from either of the separate analyses. Despite the
pitfalls of using a diploid, recombining data source like ITS at the intras
pecific level, potential benefits include tracking of maternal and paternal
lineages as well as insight into patterns and levels of gene flow among po
pulations. Furthermore, the joint use of ITS and cpDNA markers facilitates
independent assessment of intraspecific phylogenetic hypotheses and can exp
ose cases in which introgression or phylogenetic sorting has caused incongr
uencies among haplotype trees.