How much do we lose on non-quality?

Citation
E. Naveh et A. Halevy, How much do we lose on non-quality?, TOT QUAL M, 10(7), 1999, pp. 1037-1045
Citations number
4
Categorie Soggetti
Management
Journal title
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
09544127 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1037 - 1045
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-4127(199909)10:7<1037:HMDWLO>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
The economic basis of national quality efforts is now seen as natural and b eyond argument by most quality people. In order to obviate the fact that qu ality work is an essential contributor to national prosperity, we must inco rporate quality indices into the current national economic indices. The nat ional cost of non-quality is a natural index. The cost of waste caused by i nadequate designing, planning and working practices in the economy are taki ng their toll from our treasury; in fact, as much as 30 percent of the gros s national product is (carefully) estimated as cost of non-quality. One way of measuring and controlling this waste is to define and implement a natio nal cost of non-quality index. Another approach, proposed here, is the crea tion of a simpler index, one that measures losses incurred to the public du e to faulty products and services. This index is easy to measure and may se rve as an indicator of the quality of products and services produced and pr ovided to the population. Data collected in a survey are presented and rule s for data collection and analysis are discussed.