The Forssman antigen has been proposed to be a target for the xenograft rea
ction in selected species combinations, including the rat and mouse, which
are Forssman-negative and -positive species respectively. The mouse represe
nts an important experimental model for a variety of immune-mediated diseas
e processes, and the availability of a simple, inexpensive target antigen c
ould provide an important tool for studying a selected portion of the immun
ologic basis for the rejection of xenografts. We have examined the potentia
l that antibodies directed against mouse Forssman antigen could cause the h
yperacute rejection of mouse heart xenografts in naive rat recipients. The
Forssman antibodies tested included rat anti-mouse (R-anti-M) antiserum, R-
anti-M antiserum depleted of anti-Forssman (anti-F) antibodies, rat anti-sh
eep red blood cell (SRBC) antiserum containing anti-F antibodies and a rat
monoclonal anti-F IgM antibody. Our results demonstrate that the R-anti-M a
ntiserum at day 4 post transplantation displayed significant titers (1:512-
4096) of hemagglutinating antibodies for SRBC and mild to moderate levels o
f IgM that specifically binds to Forssman glycolipid (GalNAc alpha 1-3GalNA
c beta 1-3Ga1 alpha 1-4Gal beta 1-4Glc beta 1-1 ceramide) as measured by an
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Passive transfer of the R-anti-
M serum to rats receiving mouse cardiac grafts immediately after transplant
ation caused hyperacute rejection of the xenografts, Sequential immunoabsor
ption of R-anti-M sera with SRBCs resulted in total removal of the anti-For
ssman activity (as defined by negative hemagglutination titer and minimal b
inding to Forssman glycolipid in ELISA). The anti-F Ab-depleted R-anti-M an
tisera, however, retained the capacity to induce hyperacute rejection of th
e mouse hearts [n = 6, median survival time (MST) 13 min] when passively tr
ansferred to rat recipients. Anti-Forssman antibodies induced by immunizati
on of LEW rats with SRBCs or a rat anti-Forssman monoclonal antibody, mAb M
.1.22.25, exhibited substantial anti-Forssman activity (hemagglutinating ti
ter 1:512-096 and moderate-to-strong binding to Forssman glycolipid in ELIS
A respectively). These antibodies also failed, however, to trigger hyperacu
te rejection of mouse cardiac xenografts. In conclusion, our results sugges
t that the rat anti-Forssman antibodies, including those stimulated by mous
e cardiac xenografts, do not appear to play a role in the immediate (hypera
cute) rejection of mouse heart xenografts.