This study is concerned with how judges identify and assess children's cred
ibility in court judgements about sexual abuse. It is especially concerned
with cases where those accused plead innocent. Two themes on credibility ru
n through the judgements: the children's personal characters and narrative
styles. The judges, in their descriptions of the children, set the scene an
d predispose readers to have certain responses towards the children before
they issue definite conclusions about the children's credibility. Further,
evidence of credibility is at times re-constructed from impressions of the
children's behavioural competence. Hence credibility is based on descriptio
ns of individual moral standing rather than on certain scientifically accep
ted elements in the interview that limit or enhance the believability of a
case.