Univariate estimates of sexual dimorphism: The effects of intrasexual variability

Citation
E. Marini et al., Univariate estimates of sexual dimorphism: The effects of intrasexual variability, AM J P ANTH, 109(4), 1999, pp. 501-508
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology","Experimental Biology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029483 → ACNP
Volume
109
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
501 - 508
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9483(199908)109:4<501:UEOSDT>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The difference between male and female values of quantitative traits depend s on the distribution of the variables within each sex, increasing with the rise in the difference between male and female average values and with the decrease of the dispersion of measurements in both sexes. This paper deals with the sensitivity of some widely used indices (relative difference between male and female mean values (MDI), Student's t, and the so-called Bennett-Chakraborty-Majumder D coefficient) with respect to intr asexual variability. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance (KS) is suggested here as a further index of dimorphism, although it is not usually utilized for this purpose. The theoretical approach is accompanied by the analysis of empirical data ( metric variables obtained from a sample of present Sardinians) and by compu ter simulations under various assumptions. Indices based on the difference between male and female average values are not able to evaluate fully the various aspects of dimorphism. Student's t p roved to be an adequate measure of whole sex differences, both in real and in simulated samples, as intrasexual variability is included in its formula tion. The D index also proved to be a good measure of undivided sexual dimo rphism, as it is the result of formal examination, and from application to empirical or to simulated cases. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance gave the best performance both in formal ex amination and in the whole simulation results, as it takes into account int rasexual variability, and is applicable to any kind of distribution. In sim ulated cases it was sensitive to variations of means and variances, and it was able to evaluate variance dimorphism. Since the last three indices measure the combined effect of size and varian ce dimorphism, the joint use of the MDI index is suggested in order to isol ate the relative contribution of the difference between the means. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.