Sp. Mcgorray et al., Evaluation of orthodontists' perception of treatment need and the peer assessment rating (PAR) index, ANGL ORTHOD, 69(4), 1999, pp. 325-333
This paper examines the relationship between orthodontists' subjective asse
ssment of treatment need and objective measurements obtained during standar
dized intra- and extraoral examinations. Logistic regression modeling was u
sed to develop predictive models of treatment need. Data were obtained from
1155 eighth-grade students by four orthodontists who used standardized exa
mination forms to assess demographics, trauma, skeletal relationships, morp
hologic malocclusion traits, and mandibular function. At the conclusion of
the examination, the orthodontist rated the subjective treatment need as no
ne, elective, recommended, soon, or immediate. For some analyses, the categ
ories were collapsed to represent no need and need. The peer assessment rat
ing (PAR) index (American validated version) was computed from the clinical
exam findings and scoring of dental models; PAR scores were used to docume
nt malocclusions severity and treatment difficulty. Spearman rank correlati
on coefficients quantified the relationship between PAR scores and need cat
egories. Logistic regression analysis modeled treatment need using componen
ts of the PAR index as well as other variables. The components of these mod
els, as well as sensitivity and specificity were compared with malocclusion
severity/treatment difficulty scores obtained from malocclusion assessment
s using the PAR index. The five subjective treatment need categories and th
e PAR index scores were significantly correlated (rho=0.62, p<0.001). Signi
ficant difference were detected between the need and no need groups for all
PAR components (p<0.001). PAR index scores and predicted probabilities fro
m logistic regression models performed equally well for classification purp
oses (no need, need). The data suggest that the PAR index is highly correla
ted with orthodontists' subjective assessment of treatment need when that a
ssessment is made in the absence of financial considerations and patient de
sires.