Effect of application of force to self-adhesive defibrillator pads on transthoracic electrical impedance and countershock success

Citation
De. Persse et al., Effect of application of force to self-adhesive defibrillator pads on transthoracic electrical impedance and countershock success, ANN EMERG M, 34(2), 1999, pp. 129-133
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
01960644 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
129 - 133
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-0644(199908)34:2<129:EOAOFT>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Study objective: To examine the effect of the application of force to self- adhesive defibrillator pads on transthoracic electrical impedance and count ershock success. Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study was carried out in an experimental animal laboratory, involving 32 mixed-breed swine weighi ng 36.5 to 55.7 kg each. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced, and the animals were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 groups, with 8 animals per group . Animals in groups I and II remained in VF for 30 seconds; those in groups III and IV remained in VF for 5 minutes. At the end of the VF period, up t o 3 countershocks were given. In groups I and III, countershocks were deliv ered through the self-adhesive defibrillator pads alone; in groups II and I V, they were delivered through the defibrillator pads with 25 lb of applied force. Any animal without return of spontaneous circulation after 3 counte rshocks was given epinephrine after 1 minute of CPR, followed by 1 addition al minute of CPR and 1 additional countershock if required. Results: The main measurements included baseline and countershock transthor acic impedance, cumulative countershock success rate, and 30-minute surviva l rate. Application of 25 lb of force to the defibrillator pads significant ly decreased transthoracic impedance, compared with baseline values (group II, 15.1% decrease; group IV, 16.1% decrease). The first-shock success rate was higher when force was applied during the countershock (87.5% versus 50 % for groups II and I, respectively; 62.5% and 37.5% for groups IV and III, respectively). In the animals who experienced 5 minutes of VF, there were greater rates of success after the second, third, and fourth countershocks when force was applied (group IV) than when no force was applied (group III ). Groups I and II (VF for 30 seconds) demonstrated 100% survival at 30 min utes. Group IV had a higher 30-minute survival rate (3/8 animals) than did group III (1/8). However, the rates of countershock success and 30-minute s urvival were not statistically different among the groups. Conclusion: Application of force to self-adhesive defibrillator pads decrea ses transthoracic impedance during countershock. This effect may contribute to improving the countershock success rate.