Objective
To assess the complications of level I and II axillary lymph node dissectio
n in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer, with breast-conservatio
n surgery and mastectomy.
Summary Background Data
The role of axillary dissection for staging, and as an effective means of c
ontrolling regional nodal disease, has long been recognized. As small and l
ow-grade lesions have been detected more frequently, and as its therapeutic
impact has been questioned, axillary dissection has increasingly been perc
eived as associated with significant complications.
Methods
Two hundred patients, 112 of whom had breast-conservation surgery with axil
lary dissection and 88 of whom had total mastectomy with axillary dissectio
n, were evaluated 1 year or more after surgery for arm swelling as well as
nonedema complications. All patients had arm circumference measurements at
the same four sites on both the operated and nonoperated sides.
Results
No patient had an axillary recurrence. The mean difference in circumference
on the nonoperated versus operated side was 0.425 cm +/- 1.39 at the midbi
ceps (p < 0.001), 0.315 cm +/- 1.27 at the antecubital fossa (p < 0.001), 0
.355 cm +/- 1.53 at the midforearm (p < 0.005), and 0.055 cm +/- 0.75 at th
e wrist (n.s.). Seven patients (3.5%) had mild swelling of the hand. Heavy
and obese body habitus were the only significant predictors of edema on mul
tivariate analysis. One hundred fifty-three (76.5%) patients had numbness o
r paresthesias of the medial arm and/or axilla after surgery; in 125 (82%)
of these, the problem had lessened or had resolved on follow-up assessment.
Conclusions
The characterization of a level I and II axillary dissection as a procedure
with significant complications does not appear justified based on this exp
erience.