Modification of leukotriene A(4) hydrolase/aminopeptidase by sulfhydryl-blocking reagents: Differential effects on dual enzyme activities by methyl-methane thiosulfonate
L. Orning et Fa. Fitzpatrick, Modification of leukotriene A(4) hydrolase/aminopeptidase by sulfhydryl-blocking reagents: Differential effects on dual enzyme activities by methyl-methane thiosulfonate, ARCH BIOCH, 368(1), 1999, pp. 131-138
The presence of a cysteine residue at or near the active site of leukotrien
e A(4) hydrolase (EC 3.3.2.6) was suggested by inactivation of the enzyme w
ith sulfhydryl-blocking reagents and by protection against inactivation aff
orded by substrates and competitive inhibitors. The aminopeptidase activity
was more susceptible to inactivation than the epoxide hydrolase activity.
The sulfhydryl-modifying reagent methylmethane thiosulfonate reacted with o
ne thiol as judged by kinetic data and titration with 5,5'-dithiobis-2-nitr
obenzoate, Inactivation was a time- and dose-dependent process of apparent
pseudo-first-order and maximal at 80-85%, The inactivation rate was nonsatu
rable and strongly influenced by ion strength. The second-order rate consta
nt increased from 0.9 to 4.3 M-1 s(-1) in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl. Album
in, a stimulator of the aminopeptidase activity, increased apparent inactiv
ation rates by shifting pK(a) for the modification from 8.2 to 7.8. The ina
ctivated enzyme partially regained activity upon treatment with P-mercaptoe
thanol, Peptide substrates and competitive inhibitors protected against ina
ctivation. Bestatin, a competitive inhibitor, afforded complete protection
with a K-D = 0.15 mu M, similar to K-i = 0.17 mu M for inhibition of peptid
ase activity, Treated enzyme had an unchanged K-m but a reduced V-max. The
epoxide hydrolase activity was only weakly affected by methylmethane thiosu
lfonate with a maximal inactivation of 15-20% after prolonged treatment, Pr
etreatment of leukotriene A(4) hydrolase with the reagent did not protect a
gainst mechanism-based inactivation by its lipid substrate, leukotriene A(4
). On the other hand, leukotriene B-4 was a competitive inhibitor of aminop
eptidase activity and protected against modification by methyl-methane thio
sulfonate. Our results suggest the presence of a cysteine at or close to su
bsite S-1' of the active site of leukotriene A(4) hydrolase and that modifi
cation of this residue interferes with the function of the aminopeptidase a
ctivity, but not the epoxide hydrolase activity. This is the first report t
o distinguish the two catalytic activities of leukotriene A(4) hydrolase by
chemical means. (C) 1999 Academic Press.