H. Hildebrand et al., Urinary antigens as markers of papillary toxicity. II: Application of monoclonal antibodies for the determination of papillary antigens in rat urine, ARCH TOXIC, 73(4-5), 1999, pp. 233-245
We have previously reported the preparation of monoclonal antibodies specif
ic for antigens localized in the rat renal papilla. Three of the monoclonal
antibodies reacting with antigens localized in papillary and cortical coll
ecting duct epithelia were selected for the development of enzyme-linked im
munosorbent assay (ELISA)-type assays. The papillary antigens ('PapA') dete
rmined in these tests were designated PapA1 (applying the monoclonal antibo
dy PapX 5C10), PapA2 (applying the monoclonal antibody PapX 12F6), and PapA
3 (applying the monoclonal antibody PapXI 3C7). Using these assays antigen
excretion was determined in the urine of rats. Depending on the test compou
nd used, the application route, and the dose, the observed antigen release
patterns differed. Whereas after a single intraperitoneal application of 2-
bromoethanamine or of propyleneimine an increased release of PapA1 but not
of the two other antigens was observed oral application of bromoethanamine
had minor effects. In contrast, both a single intraperitoneal application o
r repeated oral applications of indomethacin resulted in an increased relea
se of all the three antigens. Daily application of ipsapirone in the diet o
r in drinking water resulted in significantly elevated urinary release of P
apA1 which increased incrementally for the duration of the application. Rel
ease of PapA2 and PapA3 was not affected and remained in the normal range.
These results show that with the tests developed changes in the rat renal p
apilla caused by xenobiotics can be detected early by urinary analysis and
monitored during follow-up studies. Moreover, the different antigen release
patterns obtained after application of the different compounds suggest a p
ossible differing mode of action.