The Bright SHARC Survey: The X-ray cluster luminosity function

Citation
Rc. Nichol et al., The Bright SHARC Survey: The X-ray cluster luminosity function, ASTROPHYS J, 521(1), 1999, pp. L21-L24
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Space Sciences
Journal title
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
0004637X → ACNP
Volume
521
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Part
2
Pages
L21 - L24
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-637X(19990810)521:1<L21:TBSSTX>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
We present here initial results on the X-ray cluster luminosity function (X CLF) from the Bright Serendipitous High-Redshift Archival Cluster (SHARC) s ample of distant X-ray clusters of galaxies. This sample is 97% complete in its optical identifications and contains 12 X-ray-luminous clusters in the redshift range 0.3 less than or equal to z less than or equal to 0.83 (med ian z = 0.42) and 1.1 x 10(44) less than or equal to L-X less than or equal to 8.3 X 10(44) ergs s(-1) (0.5-2.0 keV). We present a preliminary selecti on function for the Bright SHARC Survey based on Monte Carlo simulations. U sing this selection function, we have computed the Bright SHARC Survey XCLF and find it to be fully consistent with a nonevolving XCLF to L-X similar or equal to 5 x 10(44) ergs s(-1) and z similar or equal to 0.7. At L-X > 5 x 10(44) ergs s(-1), we find evidence for a deficit of clusters compared t o that expected from a nonevolving XCLF. We detect only one such cluster in the redshift range 0.3 less than or equal to z less than or equal to 0.7 w hen we would expect 4.9 clusters based on the local XCLF of De Grandi et al . The statistical significance of this deficit is similar or equal to 96%. To increase the statistical significance of this possible deficit, we have combined the Bright SHARC Survey and the 160 deg(2) survey of Vikhlinin et al. This joint survey covers similar or equal to 260 deg(2) and contains on ly one confirmed 0.3 less than or equal to z less than or equal to 0.7, L-X > 5 x 10(44) ergs s(-1) cluster, while we would expect 7.6 such clusters b ased on the local XCLF (De Grandi et al.), The statistical significance of the deficit in this joint survey increases to 99.5%. These results remain p reliminary because of incompletenesses in the optical follow-up and uncerta inties in the local XCLF.