The author group takes stock of the last seven years of the EU programs TA-
CIS and PHARE. These programs represent a safety partnership between East a
nd West intended to improve the standards of reactors of Soviet design. A w
estern partner is assigned to each participating gene rating station in an
East European country. Until the beginning of this year, the EU received te
chnical advice from a commission of atomic power station operators from sev
en EU countries; the contract was not renewed.
However, the authors criticise not only the decision to dispense with techn
ical support. The main point of criticism is the delay or bottlenecking of
projects caused by complicated procedural rules. In some cases, processing
times are so long that the project will not - as laid down in the TACHIS re
gulations - be concluded within five years from the date of funding approva
l. Result: currently, some 25 safety-related projects in Russia face cancel
lation; the threatened loss runs into millions.
Despite these bureaucratic obstacles, both eastern and western partners ple
ad for a continuation of the programs.