Ers. Nijenhuis et al., Somatoform dissociation discriminates among diagnostic categories over andabove general psychopathology, AUST NZ J P, 33(4), 1999, pp. 511-520
Objective: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis
that somatoform dissociation would differentiate among specific diagnostic
categories after controlling for general psychopathology.
Method: The Somatoform Dissocation Questionnaire (SDQ-20), the Dissociative
Experiences Scale, and the Symptom Checklist-90-R were completed by patien
ts with DSM-IV diagnoses of dissociative disorders (n = 44), somatoform dis
orders (n = 47), eating disorders (n = 50), bipolar mood disorder (n = 23),
and a group of consecutive psychiatric outpatients with other psychiatric
disorders (n = 45), mainly including anxiety disorders, depression, and adj
ustment disorder.
Results: The SDQ-20 significantly differentiated among diagnostic groups in
the hypothesised order of increasing somatoform dissociation, both before
and after statistically controlling for general psychopathology. Somatoform
dissociation was extreme in dissociative identity disorder, high in dissoc
iative disorder, not otherwise specified, and increased in somatoform disor
ders, as well as in a subgroup of patients with eating disorders. In contra
st with somatoform dissociation, psychological dissociation did not discrim
inate between bipolar mood disorder and somatoform disorders.
Conclusions: Somatoform dissociation is a unique construct that discriminat
es among diagnostic categories. It is highly characteristic of dissociative
disorder patients, a core feature in many patients with somatoform disorde
rs, and an important symptom cluster in a subgroup of patients with eating
disorders.