K. Manassis et al., Assessing attachment: convergent validity of the adult attachment interview and the parental bonding instrument, AUST NZ J P, 33(4), 1999, pp. 559-567
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether or not the Parent
al Bonding Instrument (PBI) can provide information about parent-child atta
chment that is comparable to information obtained from the Adult Attachment
Interview (AAI), a more complex measure of attachment.
Method: One hundred and thirty emotionally and/or behaviourally disturbed a
dolescents (73 male, 57 female; ages 13-19 years, x = 15.3 +/- 1.47 years)
participating in a study of attachment and suicidality completed the PBI an
d the AAI. Data from these measures were compared within participants.
Results: Maternal care and overprotection on the PBI differed significantly
by AAI attachment classification (F-3,F-122 = 2.79, p = 0.012), with auton
omous participants showing the most optimal and unresolved participants the
least optimal PBI results. Maternal love and maternal involvement/role rev
ersal on the AAI were significant predictors of maternal care and maternal
overprotection, respectively, on the PBI (R-2 = 0.15; R-2 = 0.16). These pr
edictions improved when AAI scales measuring idealisation and involving ang
er towards the mother were included in the regression analyses (R-2 = 0.35;
R-2 = 0.20), Autonomous participants on AAI showed the highest scale corre
lations across instruments.
Conclusions: Attachment information obtained from the PBI and the AAI is co
mparable in participants with optimal attachment histories, but not in part
icipants showing idealisation or anger towards their mothers. Caution is, t
herefore, advisable when using the PBI to obtain attachment information in
clinical samples where suboptimal attachment histories are likely.