North American benthic research in sedimentary estuarine environments began
with an emphasis on descriptions of organism distributions and abundance.
These efforts resulted in a crude map of infaunal assemblage types. This ma
p is not complete even today but the data allow us to ask questions about p
attern. As is typical of such efforts, the majority of the techniques used
to evaluate the existence of infaunal patterns are correlative and thus res
ult in only weak inferences which do not necessarily expose the causal rela
tionships. Such approaches dominated sedimentary benthic ecology until the
1960s and 1970s when investigators began to concentrate to a much larger ex
tent on elucidating causal mechanisms. The original stimulus for this chang
e has its origins in the work of Sanders and Rhoads and their collaborators
who recognized the link between the activities of the infauna and the stru
cture of the habitat. Additionally in the 1970s, several investigators with
strong ties to rocky intertidal benthic ecology, where manipulative experi
ments have been enormously successful, began publishing their work which ac
celerated the move to address mechanisms through experimentation. During th
e 1980s and 1990s the emphasis on explicit experiments has continued. In th
is contribution I explore our current understanding of the processes that l
ead to patterns of distribution and abundance in marine sedimentary assembl
ages and our ability to ask testable questions concerning mechanism in this
habitat.