This article presents arguments to support the provision of differentiated
curricula and programs for academically gifted and talented students and id
entifies a range of socio-political attitudes which have militated against
the development of such programs in Australian schools. Gross discusses Aus
tralians' traditional suspicion of any process which might be construed as
elitist; our reluctance to acknowledge intellectual talent even while we en
thusiastically foster talent in sport and athletics; the view of excellence
and equity as conflicting rather than complementary; and the confusion bet
ween the concept of gifts and strengths.