The case for special programs for children with exceptional abilities can o
nly benefit from separating good arguments from bad ones. I attempt here to
distinguish what is valuable in Miraca Gross's case for gifted education f
rom what fails to stand up to closer examination. In particular, I argue th
at talent is not a 'national resource', and that educational programs for c
hildren should aim at their interest, not other people's. The best argument
here is the simplest and most straightforward one: children should be give
n what they need, and they need opportunities to develop whatever talents t
hey have.