The paper argues for a pragmatic account of genetic explanation. This is to
say that when a disease or other trait is termed 'genetic,' the reasons fo
r singling out genes as causes over other, also necessary, genetic and nong
enetic conditions are not wholly theoretical but include pragmatic dimensio
ns. Whether the explanation is the presence of a trait in an individual or
differences in a trait among individuals, genetic explanations are context-
dependent in three ways: they are relative to a causal background of geneti
c and nongenetic factors; they are relative to a population; and they are r
elative to the present state of knowledge. Criteria like causal priority, n
onstandardness, and causal efficacy that purport to distinguish objectively
between genetic causes and nongenetic conditions either incorporate pragma
tic elements or fail for other reasons. When the pragmatic dimensions of ge
netic explanations are recognized, we come to understand the current phenom
enon of "geneticization'' to be a reflection of increased technological cap
acities to manipulate genes in the laboratory, and potentially the clinic,
rather than theoretical progress in understanding how diseases and other tr
aits arise. This calls into question the value of the search for theoretica
l definitions of designations like 'genetic disease' or 'genetic susceptibi
lity' as directives for action.