Treatment outcome and prognostic factors for relapse after high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell rescue for patients with poor risk high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Sm. Lee et al., Treatment outcome and prognostic factors for relapse after high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell rescue for patients with poor risk high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, BONE MAR TR, 24(3), 1999, pp. 271-277
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
The aim of the study was to determine treatment outcome and identify a part
icularly high risk group in a consecutive series of 66 patients with poor p
rognosis high grade lymphoma (NHL) treated with conventional induction chem
otherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and peripheral blood ste
m cells (PBSC) rescue. Fifty-one patients with intermediate grade NHL (Kiel
) and two or three adverse prognostic features as defined by the age-adjust
ed International Prognostic Index (IPI) received induction treatment with 7
weeks of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide,
prednisolone and methotrexate (VAPEC-B) followed by three cycles of ifosfa
mide/cytarabine. Fifteen patients with high grade Burkitt's and lymphoblast
ic NHL received 11 weeks of VAPEC-B followed by three cycles of high-dose m
ethotrexate. HDCT for all 66 patients consisted of busulphan/cyclophosphami
de followed by autologous PBSC rescue. Thirty-one patients (47%) received H
DCT in first complete remission (CR/CRu) and 34 patients (52%) in first par
tial remission (PR) after conventional chemotherapy, Following HDCT, 42 pat
ients (64%) were in CR/CRu, 19 patients (29%) in PR and one patient had pro
gressive disease. There were four toxic deaths. After a median follow-up pe
riod of 27 months (range 7-73) in 46 surviving patients, the actuarial 3-ye
ar estimates of overall survival, event-free survival (EFS) and freedom fro
m progression (FFP) were 67%, 65% and 70%, respectively. In univariate anal
ysis, prognostic factors associated with reduced EFS were mediastinal bulk
(P = 0.02), greater than or equal to 3 extra-nodal sites (P = 0.02), remiss
ion status prior to HDCT (P = 0.05), low albumin (P = 0.08) and raised ESR
(P = 0.09). No significant difference was observed between patients with in
termediate or high grade NHL or between patients with two or three adverse
IPI features. Multivariate analysis identified mediastinal bulk (P = 0.01),
greater than or equal to 3 extra-nodal sites (P = 0.01) and low albumin (P
= 0.03) as joint predictors of poor EFS. Remission status prior to HDCT wa
s not found to be significantly associated with reduced EFS, FFP or surviva
l, suggesting early introduction of HDCT may benefit patients with a PR. Ba
sed on these three adverse features, three groups (0, 1 or greater than or
equal to 2 features) could be identified with differing EFS, survival and f
reedom from progression (FFP) rates at 3 years; 85%, 63% and 20%, respectiv
ely for EFS, 84%, 64% and 25% for survival and 85%, 66% and 33%, respective
ly for FFP. This prognostic model may identify patients with a particularly
poor prognosis despite HDCT, who may benefit from other therapeutic approa
ches.