Sublethal anoxia/ischemia protects against subsequent damaging insults in i
ntact brain or hippocampal slices. To help further understand mechanisms un
derlying anoxic/ischemic preconditioning, we tested three hypotheses which
were that: (a) anoxic preconditioning (APC) improves electrical recovery in
rat hippocampal slices; (b) anoxic preconditioning requires nitric oxide (
NO); and (c) anoxic preconditioning blocks mitochondrial dysfunction that o
ccurs following re-oxygenation after anoxia. Control hippocampal slices und
erwent a single 'test' anoxic insult. Experimental slices were precondition
ed by 3 short anoxic insults prior to the 'test' insult. Evoked potentials
(EPs), and NADH redox status were recorded prior to, during and after preco
nditioning and/or 'test' anoxic insults. To examine the role of NO, studies
sought to determine whether APC could be produced by the NO donor, DEA/NO,
and whether APC could be inhibited by NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor (7-nitro
indazole). EP amplitudes recovered significantly better after reoxygenation
in preconditioned slices and after NO-emulated preconditioning (90.0 +/- 1
7.7% and 90.0 +/- 21.3%, respectively, n = 9, ** p < 0.01, vs. 17.0 +/- 7.9
%, n = 9, in control slices). Inhibition of NOS blocked APC protection (6.8
+/- 6.8%, n = 9). The intensity of NADH hyperoxidation was not significant
ly different among groups following 'test' anoxia. These data confirm that
preconditioning by anoxia improves electrical recovery after anoxia in hipp
ocampal slices. Evidence supports that NO from constitutive hippocampal NOS
may be involved in the neuroprotection afforded by preconditioning by a me
chanism that does not change the apparent mitochondrial hyperoxidation afte
r anoxia. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.