Sl. Hersey et al., NICARDIPINE VERSUS NITROPRUSSIDE FOR CONTROLLED HYPOTENSION DURING SPINAL SURGERY IN ADOLESCENTS, Anesthesia and analgesia, 84(6), 1997, pp. 1239-1244
Nicardipine or nitroprusside was used to induce controlled hypotension
in healthy adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing spinal fu
sion. Twenty patients were randomly assigned to the nitroprusside (N)
or nicardipine (C) group. All patients received a standardized anesthe
tic. A target mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of 60 mm Hg was achie
ved by varying the vasoactive infusions only. Moderate hemodilution (P
CV = 25) and intraoperative blood salvage were used in all cases. Hemo
dynamic variables, blood loss, occurrence of reflex tachycardia, and r
eversibility of the hypotensive state were compared between the two gr
oups. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in
the amount of blood loss and reversibility of the hypotensive state. G
roup C had less blood loss (761 +/- 199 mt) than Group N (1297.5 +/- 2
64, P less than or equal to .05). Time to restoration of baseline MAP
was longer with Group C (26.8 +/- 4.0 min) than Group N (7.3 +/- 1.1 m
in, P less than or equal to 0.001). Both drugs rapidly achieved a stab
le, controlled hypotensive state and an acceptable operating field. Th
ere was no statistically significant difference between groups with re
spect to the amount of crystalloid administered or urine output. These
results suggest that nicardipine is a safe, effective drug for contro
lled hypotension in this population and that it may offer the signific
ant advantage of reduced blood loss in these patients.