Addition of femoral 3-in-1 blockade to intra-articular ropivacaine 0.2% does not reduce analgesic requirements following arthroscopic knee surgery

Citation
Skw. Schwarz et al., Addition of femoral 3-in-1 blockade to intra-articular ropivacaine 0.2% does not reduce analgesic requirements following arthroscopic knee surgery, CAN J ANAES, 46(8), 1999, pp. 741-747
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE
ISSN journal
0832610X → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
741 - 747
Database
ISI
SICI code
0832-610X(199908)46:8<741:AOF3BT>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the addition of a preincisional femora l 3-in-1 block to intra-articular instillation with ropivacaine 0.2% at the end of surgery improves postoperative pain control in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) under general anesthesia. Methods: In a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind tri al, we studied 44 patients scheduled for inpatient ACLR, Prior to incision, the treatment group (n = 22) received a femoral 3-in-1 block with 40 ml ro pivacaine 0.2%, augmented by infiltrations of the lateral and anteromedial incisions with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.2% at the end of the procedure. The cont rol group (n = 22) received saline 0.9% instead of ropivacaine, Ail patient s received an intra-articular instillation with 30 ml ropivacaine 0.2% at t he end of surgery. The primary efficacy variable was 24 hr morphine consump tion postoperatively standardized by weight, administered intravenously via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Results: There was no difference between both groups in 24 hr PCA morphine consumption postoperatively (control, 0.45 +/- 0.44 [mean +/- SD] mg.kg(-1) ; treatment, 0.37 +/- 0.50 mg.kg(-1); P = 0.55), No difference was found in postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, adverse events, or vital si gns. In the treatment group, R = 10/22 patients did not require postoperati ve morphine compared with R = 6/22 in the control group (P = 0.35). Conclusion: We found no effect of a femoral 3-in-1 block with ropivacaine 0 .2% on postoperative analgesic consumption, compared to intra-articular ins tillation with ropivacaine 0.2% alone, in patients undergoing ACLR under ge neral anesthesia.