M. Lock et Jg. Ray, Higher neonatal morbidity after routine early hospital discharge: Are we sending newborns home too early?, CAN MED A J, 161(3), 1999, pp. 249-253
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: A growing body of evidence suggests that the trend toward earli
er discharge may affect newborn morbidity. The authors assessed how hospita
l re admission rates were affected by a clinical guideline aimed at dischar
ging newborns from hospital 24 hours after birth.
Method: A retrospective before-after cohort study was conducted involving 7
009 infants born by uncomplicated vaginal delivery at a large level II hosp
ital in Toronto between Dec. 31, 1993, and Sept. 29, 1997. The primary outc
ome was a comparison of the rate of hospital readmission among newborns bef
ore (5936 infants) and after (1073 infants) the early-discharge policy was
implemented (Apr. 1, 1997). The causes for readmission were secondary outco
mes.
Results: Before the early-discharge guideline was implemented, the mean len
gth of stay declined from 2.25 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.18-2.32
) to 1.88 days (95% CI 1.84-1.92) (p < 0.001). After implementation there w
as a further decline, to 1.62 days (95% CI 1.56-1.67) (p < 0.001). A total
of 126 infants (11.7%) in the early-discharge cohort required readmission b
y 1 month, as compared with 396 infants (6.7%) in the preguideline cohort (
odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.51-2.30). The main reason for early readmission w
as neonatal jaundice, with a higher rate among infants in the early-dischar
ge cohort than among those in the preguideline cohort (8.6% v. 3.1%; odds r
atio 2.96, 95% CI 2.29-3.84).
Interpretation: Decreases in newborn length of stay may result in substanti
al increases in morbidity. Careful consideration is needed to establish whe
ther a reduction in length of stay to less than 24 to 36 hours is harmful t
o babies.