A cell's decision whether, to undergo apoptosis (cell suicide is exami
ned from an adaptationist perspective, rather than a mechanistic one.
External and internal inputs to the cell's protein-based information p
rocessing network are used in making this decision, with the cell fact
oring in its replaceability. A system in which each cell fakes primary
responsibility, deciding its own fate has great adaptive value becaus
e it harness each cell's self-knowledge rather than waiting for extern
al cues to be recognised by other cells. Cell self-destruction can be
an important selective mechanism, potentially leading to better perfor
mance of tissues over time. However, reliance on cells to monitor them
selves has a flaw, since cells may incur selfish mutations that impair
, their apoptotic responsibility. The tight control exerted over somat
ic cells serves to check selfish genes involved ill neoplasia and vira
l infections. Germ cells appear to be similarly monitored, both by oth
er germ cells and by supporting follicular or Sertoli cells, thus main
taining the advantages offered by an apoptotic system. The adaptationi
st approach views the limited replacement of neurons and cardiac myocy
tes as likely to have net survival value. The linkage of these cells i
nto a network with their neighbours throughout a lifetime allows for a
precisely functioning team of cells expected to compensate for gradua
l declines in individual cell functionality. Replacement of apoptotic
cells with naive cells might decrease brain functionality and might ri
sk upsetting the conduction of cardiac impulses. The evolutionary view
point lends itself to new hypotheses, but only tile boldest speculator
would have predicted a system in which cells are given primary respon
sibility for deciding whether to kill themselves when they deem it ben
eficial to the organism.