The application of population approaches to drug development is recommended
in several US Food and Drug Administration (Fl)A) guidance documents. Popu
lation pharmacokinetic (and pharmacodynamic) techniques enable identificati
on of the sources of inter- and intra-individual variability that impinge.
upon drug Safety and efficacy. This article briefly discusses the 2-stage a
pproach to the estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters, which r
equires serial multiple measurements on each participant, and comprehensive
ly reviews the nonlinear mixed-effects. modelling approach, which can be ap
plied in situations where extensive sampling is not done on all or any of t
he participants.
Certain preliminary information, such as the compartment model used in desc
ribing the pharmacokinetics of the drug, is required for a population pharm
acokinetic study. The practical design considerations of the location of sa
mpling times, number of samples/participants and the need to sample an indi
vidual more than once should be borne in mind. Simulation may be useful for
choosing the study design that will best meet study objectives.
The objectives of the population pharmacokinetic study can be secondary to
the objectives of the primary clinical study lin which case an add-on popul
ation pharmacokinetic protocol may be needed) or primary (when a stand-alon
e protocol is required). Having protocols for population pharmacokinetic st
udies is an integral part of 'good pharmacometric practice'.
Real-time data assembly and analysis permit an ongoing evaluation of site c
ompliance with the study protocol and provide the opportunity to correct vi
olations of study procedures. Adequate policies and procedures should be in
place for study blind maintenance. Real-time data assembly creates the opp
ortunity for detecting and correcting errors in concentration-time data, dr
ug administration history and covariate data.
Population pharmacokinetic analyses may be undertaken in 3 interwoven steps
: exploratory data analysis, model development and model validation (i.e. p
redictive performance). Documentation for regulatory purposes should includ
e a complete inventory of key runs in the analyses undertaken (with flow di
agrams if possible), accompanied by articulation of objectives, assumptions
and hypotheses. Use of diagnostic analyses of goodness of fit as evidence
of reliability of results is advised. Finally, the use of stability testing
or model validation may be warranted to support label claims.
The opinions expressed in this article were revised by incorporating commen
ts from various sources and published by the FDA as 'Guidance for Industry:
Population Pharmacokinetics' (see the FDA home page http://www.fda.gov for
further information).