Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function

Citation
P. Boissy et al., Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function, CLIN REHAB, 13(4), 1999, pp. 354-362
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
02692155 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
354 - 362
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-2155(199908)13:4<354:MGFICS>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Objectives: Previous studies have shown that recovery of recordable grip st rength in acute stroke subjects is one of the most sensitive assessments of initial upper limb recovery and a good prognostic factor for latter recove ry. The objectives of this study were to test the reliability of maximal vo luntary grip force (MVGF) measures and evaluate the relationship between pa retic grip strength deficit and paretic upper extremity function in chronic stroke subjects. Design: Over a three-week period, bilateral MVGF was assessed three times w ith a modified strain gauge dynamometer in 15 chronic stroke subjects and 1 0 control subjects. The paretic MVGF deficit was expressed in relation to t he MVGF of the nonaffected hand. Outcome measures: Upper extremity function in stroke subjects was measured using the Fugl-Meyer, the upper extremity performance test for the elderly (TEMPA), Box and Block and finger-to-nose tests. Results: MVGF measures in both groups of subjects demonstrated good reliabi lity (intraclass correlation, ICC >0.86) and low standard error measurement s (SEM). The paretic MVGF of the stroke subjects was greatly impaired in co mparison to the control subjects. Results of linear and quadratic regressio ns analyses show that this impairment was significantly correlated (p <0.01 ) with the performance of the stroke subjects on the four upper extremity f unction tests. The percentages of variances explained by the MVGF deficit o n all four upper extremity tests varied from 62% to 78% for the linear regr essions and from 72% to 93% for the quadratic regressions. Conclusions: These results suggest that the paretic maximal grip strength, normalized with the maximal grip strength on the nonaffected side, appears to be a valuable outcome measure of upper extremity function in chronic str oke subjects.