P. Boissy et al., Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function, CLIN REHAB, 13(4), 1999, pp. 354-362
Objectives: Previous studies have shown that recovery of recordable grip st
rength in acute stroke subjects is one of the most sensitive assessments of
initial upper limb recovery and a good prognostic factor for latter recove
ry. The objectives of this study were to test the reliability of maximal vo
luntary grip force (MVGF) measures and evaluate the relationship between pa
retic grip strength deficit and paretic upper extremity function in chronic
stroke subjects.
Design: Over a three-week period, bilateral MVGF was assessed three times w
ith a modified strain gauge dynamometer in 15 chronic stroke subjects and 1
0 control subjects. The paretic MVGF deficit was expressed in relation to t
he MVGF of the nonaffected hand.
Outcome measures: Upper extremity function in stroke subjects was measured
using the Fugl-Meyer, the upper extremity performance test for the elderly
(TEMPA), Box and Block and finger-to-nose tests.
Results: MVGF measures in both groups of subjects demonstrated good reliabi
lity (intraclass correlation, ICC >0.86) and low standard error measurement
s (SEM). The paretic MVGF of the stroke subjects was greatly impaired in co
mparison to the control subjects. Results of linear and quadratic regressio
ns analyses show that this impairment was significantly correlated (p <0.01
) with the performance of the stroke subjects on the four upper extremity f
unction tests. The percentages of variances explained by the MVGF deficit o
n all four upper extremity tests varied from 62% to 78% for the linear regr
essions and from 72% to 93% for the quadratic regressions.
Conclusions: These results suggest that the paretic maximal grip strength,
normalized with the maximal grip strength on the nonaffected side, appears
to be a valuable outcome measure of upper extremity function in chronic str
oke subjects.