C. Taberner et al., Basin infill architecture and evolution from magnetostratigraphic cross-basin correlations in the southeastern Pyrenean foreland basin, GEOL S AM B, 111(8), 1999, pp. 1155-1174
Magnetostratigraphy, numerical dating, and facies mapping have been combine
d to provide the first cross-basin correlation of the Eocene southeastern P
yrenean foreland basin in northeastern Spain. This has enabled (1) depositi
onal systems on the northern and southern margins of the basin to be dated
and correlated across the basin and (2) changes in the rates of sediment ac
cumulation in time and space to be evaluated. By sampling correlative inter
vals at several locations in a transect across the basin, magnetozones were
detected that otherwise may have been misinterpreted due to recent magneti
c overprinting, or missed by wide sampling intervals in previous magnetostr
atigraphic surveys. Results of this study indicate that marginal marine str
ata of the southeastern part of the foreland near the Vic area of Spain are
5 m.y. older than previously thought, the base of the interval (46 Ma) bei
ng middle Lutetian in age, By proposing an age of at least 35.68 Ma for the
overlying Cardona evaporite unit, the age span of the marine interval in t
he studied part of the foreland is similar to 10 m.y. Contrary to earlier i
nterpretations, no major southward migration of the south-eastern Pyrenean
foreland basin depocenter is recorded by the basin stratigraphy during the
initial stages of middle Eocene marine sedimentation in the southern margin
of the basin, However, marked basin asymmetry is observed later in its evo
lution as the top of the marine deposits records northward increase in the
thickness of chron C17n.1n (37.47-36.61 Ma), This asymmetry is also proved
by the presence of a larger number of magnetozones within marine strata at
the top of the marine interval in the northern sector. These results imply
that previous ape calibrations and the estimated rates of tectonic processe
s and sedimentation within the foreland need to be reassessed. The implicat
ions for basin infill architecture evolution through time and space, subsid
ence analysis, and depocenter evolution through time are addressed.