Be. Pfingst et al., Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants, HEARING RES, 134(1-2), 1999, pp. 105-115
Effects of stimulus level on discrimination of one stimulation site from an
other were examined in 15 human subjects with Nucleus-22 cochlear implant s
ystems. Bipolar stimulation was used in all cases with electrodes in the bi
polar pair separated by 1.5 mm (center to center). Subjects were first test
ed at a medium loudness level, using an adaptive tracking procedure, to det
ermine the regions of the electrode array where electrode-place discriminat
ion was best and the regions where it was poorest. Electrode-place discrimi
nation was then tested at three regions distributed throughout the array, w
hich included the regions of best and poorest discrimination. At each regio
n, electrode-place discrimination was tested at three levels: 25%, 50%, and
75% of the dynamic range. For each of these nine conditions (3 sites x 3 l
evels), the test-electrode pairs were loudness balanced with the reference-
electrode pairs. A two-interval forced-choice same-different procedure was
then used to determine discriminability of the reference-electrode pair fro
m the nearest, apical, test-electrode pair. If P(C)(max) was < 0.707 at all
three levels, additional testing was done using the next, more apical, ele
ctrode pair as the test-electrode pair. A tendency toward better discrimina
tion at more apical regions of the array was observed. Electrode pairs with
poor discrimination typically had smaller dynamic ranges than those with g
ood discrimination. There was a weak tendency toward better discrimination
at higher levels of stimulation. However, effects of level on electrode-pla
ce discrimination were less pronounced and less consistent than previously
observed effects of level on temporal discriminations. These results sugges
t interactions between current spread and the condition of the implanted co
chlea as underlying mechanisms. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. Published by
Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.