Objective-To evaluate the application of guidelines in the decision making
process leading to medical or surgical treatment for aortic stenosis in eld
erly; patients.
Design-Cohort analysis based on a prospective inclusive registry.
Setting-205 consecutive patients (greater than or equal to 70 years) with c
linically relevant isolated aortic stenosis and without serious comorbidity
, seen for the first time in the Doppler-echocardiographic laboratories of
three university hospitals in the Netherlands.
Results-The initial choice was surgery in 94 patients and medical treatment
in 111. Only 59% of the patients who should have had valve replacement acc
ording to the practice guidelines were actually offered surgical treatment.
These were mainly symptomatic patients under 80 years of age with a high g
radient. Operative mortality (30 days) was only 2%. The three year survival
was 80% in the surgical group (17 deaths among 94 patients) and 49% in the
medical group (43/111). Multivariate analysis showed that only patients wi
th a high baseline risk, mainly determined by impaired left ventricular fun
ction, had a significantly better three year survival with surgical treatme
nt than with medical treatment.
Conclusions-In daily practice, elderly patients with clinically relevant sy
mptomatic aortic stenosis are often denied surgical treatment. This study i
ndicates that a surgical approach, especially where there is impaired systo
lic left ventricular function, is associated with better survival.