Electrophysiological effects of flecainide and propafenone on atrial fibrillation cycle and relation with arrhythmia termination

Citation
M. Biffi et al., Electrophysiological effects of flecainide and propafenone on atrial fibrillation cycle and relation with arrhythmia termination, HEART, 82(2), 1999, pp. 176-182
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
HEART
ISSN journal
13556037 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
176 - 182
Database
ISI
SICI code
1355-6037(199908)82:2<176:EEOFAP>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Objectives-(1) To investigate the electrophysiological effects of flecainid e and propafenone during atrial fibrillation, and their relation to arrhyth mia termination; (2) to investigate the effects of isoprenaline on atrial f ibrillation in basal conditions and during treatment with class 1C drugs to evaluate the role of adrenergic stimulation on proarrhythmic events occurr ing during this treatment. Design-Prospective, single centre study. Setting-University hospital. Methods-10 patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent an e lectrophysiological study. The dynamic behaviour of MFF (the mean of 100 co nsecutive atrial fibrillation intervals) was evaluated at two atrial sites after induction of atrial fibrillation either at baseline or after class 1C drug administration (flecainide or propafenone 2 mg/kg). The effects of is oprenaline on MFF and RR interval were also investigated both under basal c onditions and during class 1C drug treatment. Results-After induction of atrial fibrillation, mean (SD) MFF shortened wit h time, and was further shortened by isoprenaline infusion (177 (22) v 162 (16) v 144 (11) ms, p < 0.05). The administration of class 1C drugs reverse d this trend and significantly increased the MFF to an average of 295 (49) ms, leading to conversion to sinus rhythm within 10 minutes in all patients . Atrial fibrillation was then reinduced on class 1C drugs: isoprenaline sh ortened the MFF and RR interval with a trend to AV synchronisation (223 (43 ) v 269 (49) ms for the MFF, 347 (55) v 509 (92) ms for the RR, p < 0.05); 1:1 sustained AV conduction occurred in two patients, at 187 and 222 beats/ min respectively. One of these patients underwent electrical cardioversion because of haemodynamic collapse. Conclusions-Class 1C drugs are effective at restoring sinus rhythm by incre asing the MFF to a much greater extent than observed in self terminating at rial fibrillation episodes, and reversing the spontaneous atrial fibrillati on behaviour (progressive shortening of MFF and self perpetuation of atrial fibrillation). MFF prolongation with 1:1 conduction at fast ventricular ra tes may lead to synchronisation during adrenergic stimulation, with a very short ventricular cycle; hence it is advisable to keep the patients at rest after acute class 1C drug loading or to consider pharmacological modulatio n of AV conduction for patients who are prone to a fast ventricular respons e.