Testicular sperm retrieval and cryopreservation prior to initiating ovarian stimulation as the first line approach in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia
D. Ben-yosef et al., Testicular sperm retrieval and cryopreservation prior to initiating ovarian stimulation as the first line approach in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, HUM REPR, 14(7), 1999, pp. 1794-1801
The potency for fertilization and successful implantation was compared betw
een fresh and cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa obtained from the same p
atient with nonobstructive azoospermia, Spermatozoa cryopreserved at the ou
tset were also evaluated. Non-obstructive azoospermic men(n = 55) underwent
testicular sperm extraction (TESE); mature spermatozoa were found in 33 (6
0%) of them. Of 57 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in 25 pat
ients, 15 used fresh spermatozoa (14 patients, group 1), 24 used the excess
spermatozoa cryopreserved after 'fresh' ICSI (11 couples who did not conce
ive in the 'fresh' cycle, group 2) and 18 cycles used cryopreserved spermat
ozoa at the outset (11 other patients, group 3), Fertilization, cleavage, e
mbryo quality, implantation and take home baby rates were not significantly
different in groups 1 and 2, and 6/14 couples ultimately had healthy babie
s (42.8% cumulative take home baby rate per TESE). In group 3, neither the
fertilization rate, embryo development, pregnancy nor implantation rates pe
r embryo transfer were significantly different from groups 1 and 2, The cum
ulative delivery and ongoing pregnancy rate in this group was 36.4%. Cryopr
eservation did not impair the availability of motile spermatozoa for ICSI,
When immotile spermatozoa were injected, however, fertilization rate decrea
sed dramatically. Since criteria for predicting the presence of spermatozoa
in the testicular tissue of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia are
inadequate, it is suggested that TESE be performed prior to initiating ovar
ian stimulation.