Sensitivity and specificity of a screening test to document traumatic experiences and to diagnose post-traumatic stress disorder in ARDS patients after intensive care treatment

Citation
C. Stoll et al., Sensitivity and specificity of a screening test to document traumatic experiences and to diagnose post-traumatic stress disorder in ARDS patients after intensive care treatment, INTEN CAR M, 25(7), 1999, pp. 697-704
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
03424642 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
697 - 704
Database
ISI
SICI code
0342-4642(199907)25:7<697:SASOAS>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Objective: Many survivors of critical illness and intensive care unit (ICU) treatment have traumatic memories such as nightmares, panic or pain which can be associated with the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PT SD). In order to simplify the rapid and early detection of PTSD in such pat ients, we modified an existing questionnaire for diagnosis of PTSD and vali dated the instrument in a cohort of ARDS patients after long-term ICU thera py. Design: Follow-up cohort study. Setting: The 20-bed ICU of a university teaching hospital. Patients: A cohort of 52 long-term survivors of the acute respiratory distr ess syndrome (ARDS). Interventions and measurements: The questionnaire was administered to the s tudy cohort at two time points 2 years apart. At the second evaluation, the patients underwent a structured interview with two trained psychiatrists t o diagnose PTSD according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Di sorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire was then estimated and its specificity, sensitivity and opti mal decision threshold determined using receiver operating characteristic ( ROC) curve analyses. Results: The questionnaire showed a high internal consistency (Crohnbach's alpha = 0.93) and a high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation co efficient alpha = 0.89). There was evidence of construct validity by a line ar relationship between scores and the number of traumatic memories from th e ICU the patients described (Spearman's rho = 0.48, p < 0.01). Criterion v alidity was demonstrated by ROC curve analyses resulting in a sensitivity o f 77.0 % and a specificity of 97.5 % for the diagnosis of PTSD. Conclusions: The questionnaire was found to be a responsive, valid and reli able instrument to screen survivors of intensive care for PTSD.