Background. Two sets of research diagnostic criteria, age-associated memory
impairment (AAMI) and ageing-associated cognitive decline (AACD), are wide
ly used to describe mild cognitive decline in ageing. However, the extent t
o which the nosological entities they represent are similar or distinct is
unclear.
Methods. A sample of 111 participants without dementia but with informant e
vidence of cognitive decline were drawn from the EUGERIA Study of Cognitive
Ageing, a population-based study in southern France. These participants we
re classified as either normal or with AAMI according to the criteria of Cr
ook ct nl. (1986), then reclassified as normal or with AACD according to cr
iteria recommended by Levy et al. (1994). Neuropsychological test scores we
re then compared in these two pairs of groups.
Results. Particpants were classified as either normal (N = 74) or with AAMI
(N = 37), then reclassified as normal (N = 72) or with AACD (N = 39). Only
20 (54%) of participants with AAMI simultaneously met criteria for AACD, an
d those with AACD showed more extensive cognitive impairment than those wit
h AAMI.
Conclusions. Although there is a large overlap between AAMI and AACD, these
findings suggest that AAMI and AACD refer to distinct clinical entities, t
he latter delineating a more severe state of impairment. This may be largel
y because AAMI is defined as impairment with reference to young normals, wh
ereas AACD refers to impairment with respect to normal contemporaries. Copy
right (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.