Spiders are generalist predators, abundant in terrestrial ecosystems, and h
ence good candidates for interspecific competitive constraints. Contrary to
these premises, evidence of interspecific competition in web-weaving spide
rs is ambiguous, and new experiments on natural communities are interesting
. This paper reports on an experiment designed to test competitive effects
in a natural community of web-weaving spiders, accomplished by selective re
moval of each of the three locally dominant species: Araneus marmoreus, Arg
iope bruennichi, and Agelena labyrinthica. No statistically significant dif
ference was found among control plots and the plots where one of the three
species had been removed, for any of the variables measured, but the small
number of replicates limited statistic power. Considering only effect direc
tion, and not statistical significance, these removal experiments supported
competitive effects on community structure, habitat overlap, and spider bo
dy size. On the other hand, effects were contrary to competitive expectatio
ns as regards abundance and habitat breadth. These results are in line with
the findings of the other removal experiments conducted so far on spiders,
that uncovered small intra- and interspecific competitive effects fbr some
variables but not for others. So Ear, there is no evidence that interspeci
fic competition may affect spider communities, although a low-level competi
tion remains possible, but difficult to test statistically for its evolutio
nary consequence.