In two experiments, we attempted to analyze the effects of newspaper a
rticle headlines and summaries on final comprehension and recall. Duri
ng the first experiment, the participants consisted of 117 high school
students from the 9th grade, 68 from the 11th grade, 79 first year Ps
ychology students from the Autonoma University of Madrid and 66 fifth
year Journalism students from the Complutense University of Madrid. Th
e subjects were randomly required to read a news report in one of the
following experimental conditions: (1) he whole news article (headline
, summary and text), (2) the headline and text, (3) the summary and te
xt, and (4), the text only. The data from immediate and delayed free r
ecall tasks were recorded. The results showed that the structure of th
e news article did not influence the recall and that there were differ
ences among groups in the amount and quality of recall. The headline a
nd the summary modified by the use of macrostructural criteria constit
uted additional elements introduced into the second experiment to prov
ide a contrast with the original headline and summary. The results sho
wed that an improvement in article recall did occur with the modified
version in comparison with the original version. These two experiments
have confirmed that the aims and criteria of journalists differ from
those held by the authors of scientific texts and question whether the
reading strategies applied are the same in both cases.