The Vroom-Yetton model of decision-making specifies an appropriate level of
employee participation based on an analysis of important situational attri
butes. However, much of its validity evidence has relied on managers' self-
reports of both their behavior and decision outcomes. An experimental study
was conducted to test whether performance information can activate leaders
' implicit theories of performance and bias leaders' self-ratings of their
decision-making behavior. The design was a 2 x 3 between-groups factorial m
anipulating leader decision-making style (autocratic or participative) and
level of performance feedback (high, low, or none). The data indicated that
, when given high performance feedback, leaders' self-ratings are biased by
their implicit theories of effective decision-making. This result suggests
that studies relying on managers' self-reports are likely to inflate valid
ity estimates of the Vroom-Yetton model. Group members' ratings of leader d
ecision-making behavior were also affected by highperformance feedback, but
only when they rated leaders who were instructed to use a participative de
cision-making style. The theoretical and practical implications of these fi
ndings are discussed.