The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer

Citation
Ss. Bass et al., The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer, J AM COLL S, 189(2), 1999, pp. 183-194
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
ISSN journal
10727515 → ACNP
Volume
189
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
183 - 194
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-7515(199908)189:2<183:TROSLN>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Background: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are new techniques that accurately provide crucial staging information while inflic ting far less morbidity than complete axillary dissection. As these techniq ues continue to gain acceptance, issues such as adequacy of training, certi fication, and outcomes measures become increasingly important. The purpose of this paper is to report the initial lymphatic mapping experience at the H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute and to provide a detaile d description of the technical aspects of lymphatic mapping. Study Design: From April 1994 to April 1998, 700 patients with newly diagno sed breast cancers underwent an IRE-approved prospective trial of lymphatic mapping using a combination of Lymphazurin (USSC, Norwalk, CT) blue dye an d filtered technetium 99m-labeled sulfur-colloid. Failure of the procedure was defined as the inability to detect an SLN by either radiocolloid uptake within a lymph node by the gamma probe or the inability to visualize blue staining of a lymph node. Learning curves were then generated as the failur e rate versus serial number of patients for each of the 5 surgeons involved in this study. Results: The SLN was identified in 665 of 700 patients (95.0%). A total of 1,348 SLNs were successfully removed, of which 238 (17.7%) were positive fo r metastatic disease in 176 of 665 patients (26.5%). In patients who underw ent a complete axillary dissection after SLN biopsy, SLNs were identified i n 173 of 186 patients (93.0%). Of the 173 patients, 53 patients (30.6%) had positive SLNs and 120 patients (69.4%) had negative SLNs. In the 120 patie nts with negative SLNs, one patient was found to have disease on complete d issection, for a false-negative rate of 0.83% (95% CI: 0.02%, 4.6%). A lear ning curve representing the mean of the 5 surgeons' experience indicates th at on average 23 patients are required by an individual surgeon to achieve a 90% +/- 4.5% success rate and 53 patients are required to achieve a 95% /- 2.3% success rate (p = 0.05). Conclusions: These data validate lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy as indisp ensable tools in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. With adequate mul tidisciplinary training, these techniques can be readily implemented at ins titutions treating breast cancer. (J Am Coll Surg 1999;189:183-194. (C) 199 9 by the American College of Surgeons).