L. Poliakova et al., Vascular permeability effect of adenovirus-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer to the rabbit and rat skeletal muscle, J THOR SURG, 118(2), 1999, pp. 339-347
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objective: Vascular endothelial growth factor has been used in preclinical
studies and phase 1 and 2 clinical trials as a potent mediator of therapeut
ic angiogenesis; however, its ability to enhance the vascular permeability
may be a source of potential complications. The objective of this work was
to evaluate the effects of the intramuscular injection of an adenovirus vec
tor coding for the 121-amino acid form of vascular endothelial growth facto
r (Ad.VEGF(121)) on vascular permeability and edema development in rabbits
and rats. Methods: Different concentrations of Ad.VEGF(121) ranging from 10
(5) to 10(10) plaque-forming units/mL (3 x 10(6)-3 x 10(11) particles/mL) w
ere injected into hind limb or forelimb muscles of Wistar rats or rabbits.
The size of the scrotum, the circumferences of limbs, and the concentration
of vascular endothelial growth factor in the serum were measured daily aft
er injection. Results: The injection of different concentrations of Ad.VEGF
(121) into the hind limb muscles of rabbits led to a dose-dependent scrotal
edema in rabbits at concentrations higher than 107 plaque-forming units/mL
(P = .002). The edema developed slowly, reached its maximum level 6 days a
fter the injection, and spontaneously resolved thereafter. At concentration
s higher than 10(9) plaque-forming units/mL the scrotal edema was accompani
ed by skin necrosis (P = .0001). No scrotal edema was observed in rats. Con
clusions: The massive species-specific scrotal edema accompanied by skin ul
ceration and necrosis was observed only in rabbits treated with Ad.VEGF(121
) in concentrations exceeding therapeutic doses. The therapeutic doses of A
d.VEGF(121) resulted in only moderate transient scrotal edema in rabbits, s
uggesting that the potential for side effects of vascular endothelial growt
h factor therapy as a result of increased vascular permeability should not
be very alarming for generally healthy patients and may not cause a signifi
cant clinical problem in the treatment of peripheral vascular diseases.