A. Garcia-pascual et al., Differential mechanisms of urethral smooth muscle relaxation by several NOdonors and nitric oxide, N-S ARCH PH, 360(1), 1999, pp. 80-91
We have examined the mechanisms of action of a broad spectrum of nitric oxi
de (NO) donors, including several S-nitrosothiols, sodium nitroprusside (SN
P) and nitroglycerine (GTN), in relation to their relaxant activity of uret
hral smooth muscle. For all the compounds examined, NO release tin solution
and in the presence of urethral tissue), relaxation responses, elevations
in cGMP levels and the effect of thiol modulators were evaluated and compar
ed with the effect of NO itself.
Whilst all NO donors, except GTN, released NO in solution due to photolysis
or chemical catalysis, this release was not correlated with their relaxant
activity in sheep urethral preparations, which were furthermore not affect
ed by the NO scavenger 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-
1-oxyl 3-oxide (cPTIO; 0.3 mM). A substantial NO-generating activity was fo
und for S-nitroso -L-cysteine (CysNO) and S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillam
ine (SNAP) in the presence of urethral cytosolic fractions, suggesting meta
bolic activation to NO in the cytosol of the target tissue. In contrast, NO
generation from S-nitroso-N-acetyl-L-cysteine (N-ac-CysNO), S-nitrosogluta
thione (GSNO) and SNP were reduced by the presence of urethral homogenate a
nd/or subcellular fractions, suggesting direct NO transfer to tissue consti
tuents. NO donors and NO gas induced dissimilar degrees of cGMP accumulatio
n in urethral tissue, while they were essentially equipotent as urethral re
laxants. Furthermore, 1H-[1,2,4]-oxadiazole-[4,3-a] -quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ;
10 mu M) inhibited both relaxation and cGMP accumulations, but with differ
ent potency for the different compounds. Oxidation of sarcolemmal thiol gro
ups with 5-5'-dithio-bis[2-nitrobenzoic acid] (DTNB; 0.5 mM) enhanced relax
ations to GSNO, an effect that was reversed by dithiotreitol (DTT; 1 mM), s
uggesting a direct effect through nitrosylation/oxidation reactions at the
cell membrane, while relaxations to NO and to all the other compounds were
not affected by these treatments. Finally, photodegradation of SNP induced
the formation of a stable intermediate that still evoked NO-cCMP-mediated r
elaxations. This indicates that the assumption that SNP is fully depleted o
f NO by exposure to light should be revised.
It can be concluded that important differences exist in the mechanisms by w
hich distinct NO donors relax urethral smooth muscle and they cannot be reg
arded simply as NO-releasing prodrugs.