A. Salerno et M. Georgesco, Motor evoked potentials obtained with double magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex., NEUROP CLIN, 29(3), 1999, pp. 235-253
The technique of motor evoked potentials (MEP) obtained with single and dou
ble magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in man has considerably improv
ed over the past decade. We present the techniques and parameters involved
in double magnetic stimulation for clinical purposes.
Method - The conditioning-test design is used to study modifications in the
amplitudes of the muscular responses to the "test" a shock, recorded on th
e first dorsal interosseus muscle. Enhanced amplitudes of conditioned respo
nses indicate facilitation. reduced response inhibition.
Results - The effects vary according to the shock intensity, the delay betw
een shocks and the position of the conditioning coil The latter may be loca
ted at the same place as the rest shock (to rest interneural circuitry rela
ted to pyramidal tract), on the hand area opposite the test shock (to test
interhemispheric influences), or over the cerebellar area contralateral to
the test sine (to test the effect of cerebellar stimulations over the motor
cortex). When the coils were located on the same conical hand area there w
as facilitation when the intensities rr ere both set at the threshold with
an interstimulus interval (ISI) between 1 and 2.5-3 ms. At conditioning sho
ck intensities below the threshold and the test shock 150% above, inhibitio
n occurred at ISI 1-5 ms followed by facilitation at ISI 15-35 ms. When the
intensities of both shocks rr ere 150% above threshold there were two clea
r cut individual responses at ISI above 10 ms; facilitation was recorded at
ISI 15-35 ms, and inhibition between 55 and 255 ms. When the conditioning
coil was located on the opposite hand area from the test shock (conditionin
g shock intensity supramaximal. rest shock intensity above the threshold),
ISI 1-5 ms facilitation occurred followed by inhibition up to ISI 30 ms. Wh
en the conditioning shock (intensity supramaximal) was located on the cereb
ellar area contralateral to the rest sine (intensity above the threshold),
inhibition occurred at ISI 5 ms.
Conclusions - Double magnetic stimulations delivered over the same cortical
area reflect facilitatory and inhibitory influences over the pyramidal tra
ct controlled by interneurons, i.e.. these tests investigate the intrinsic
circuitry of the motor strip. Double magnetic stimulations delivered on eac
h motor area study interhemispheric influences mediated by the corpus callo
sum which are facilitatory and inhibitory Double magnetic stimulations deli
vered on the cerebellar area demonstrates inhibitory influences over the co
ntralateral cerebral motor cortex. (C) Elsevier, Paris.