Ad. Bainbridge et al., The utility of pacemaker evoked T wave amplitude for the noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection, PACE, 22(6), 1999, pp. 942-946
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Previous work suggested that pacemaker evoked T wave amplitude (ETWA) may b
e a sensitive noninvasive marker of cardiac allograft rejection. A Topaz QT
sensing rate responsive pacemaker (Vitatron Medical) was implanted at tran
splantation using epicardial ventricular leads in 45 recipients (35 males;
median age 51 years, range 20-63). The median duration of follow-up was 129
days (range 4-327). The ETWA at a paced rate of 100 beats/min was measured
daily during hospitalization and at each outpatient attendance (900 readin
gs). Endomyocardial biopsies were at routine intervals or when otherwise cl
inically indicated (257 biopsies with concurrent ETWA data). There Ir ere 5
8 episodes of rejection greater than or equal to grade 3a in 28 patients. T
he biopsies were classed as either no rejection (grade greater than or equa
l to 3a) or rejection requiring treatment (grade greater than or equal to 3
a). The median normalized ETWA was 100.8% (range 24.6-239.7) without reject
ion and 89.9% (17.0-189.7) with rejection (Mann-Whitney U Test: P = 0.028).
The performance of ETWA monitoring as a diagnostic test for the individual
recipient was evaluated with exponentially weighted moving average quality
control charts. For the diagnosis of all rejection episodes, ETWA monitori
ng had a sensitivity of 55%, a specificity of 62%, a positive predictive va
lue of 30%, and negative predictive value of 83%. It is concluded that alth
ough analysis of pooled data showed a significant reduction in normalized E
TWA with biopsy proven rejection, ETWA monitoring requires further refineme
nt to improve sensitivity before it can be considered a clinically useful t
echnique for the non-invasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection in i
ndividual recipients.