Zl. Li et al., Evaluation of different methods for extracting relative spectral emissivity information from simulated thermal infrared multispectral scanner data, REMOT SEN E, 69(2), 1999, pp. 122-138
The performance of five published methods for extracting relative spectral
emissivity information from thermal infrared multispectral data has been ev
aluated. In the first part of this article, we have recalled those five met
hods and shown mathematically that they are almost equivalent to each other
. Then, using simulated data built up wit the TIMS (Thermal Infrared Multis
pectral Scanner) instrument, we have analyzed the sensitivity of those meth
ods to different sources of error which may occur in real data such as erro
rs due to 1) method simplification, 2) instrumental noise and systematic ca
libration error, 3) uncertainties on the estimation of downwelling atmosphe
ric radiance, and 4) uncertainties of atmospheric parameters in atmospheric
corrections. In terms of resulting errors in relative emissivity, the resu
lts show that: a) All methods are very sensitive to the uncertainties of at
mosphere. An error of 20% of water vapor in midlatitude summer atmosphere (
2.9 cm) may lead to an error of 0.03 (rms) for Channel 1 of TIMS. b) The ef
fect of the atmospheric reflection term is very important. If this term is
neglected in method development, this may lead to an error of 0.03 (rms) fo
r Channel 1 and midlatitude summer atmosphere. This is the cae for the alph
a method. c) Instrumental noise commonly expressed by noise equivalent diff
erence temperature (NE Delta T) from 0.1 K to 0.3 K results in an error of
relative emissivity ranging from 0.002 to 0.005 for all methods. d) Error i
n relative emissivity due to the instrument calibration error (systematic e
rror) is negligible. The stud also shows that the relative emissivity deriv
ed wit an incorrect atmosphere is linearly related to its actual value deri
ved with correct atmospheric parameters. Based on this property, we propose
three methods to correct for the errors caused by atmospheric corrections
under horizontally invariant atmospheric conditions. A practical analysis w
ith the real TIMS data acquired for Hapex-Sahel experiment in 1992 supports
the results of this simulation. (C) Elsevier Science Inc., 1999.